6 September 2016 – “Tor hasn’t changed, it’s the world that’s changed,” says Aaron Johnson, the lead researcher on a 2013 paper which reported that 80% of Tor users could be de-anonymized within six months, and that today’s users may want protection from different threats.
In a recent Ars Technica piece J Porup noted the most probable future we face is a world in which Tor continues to offer a good-but-not-perfect, general-purpose anonymity system, while new anonymity networks arrive offering stronger anonymity optimised for particular use-cases, like anonymous messaging, anonymous filesharing, anonymous microblogging, and anonymous voice-over-IP.
Nor is the Tor Project standing still. Tor today is very different from the first public release more than a decade ago, Tor project cofounder Nick Mathewson is quick to point out. That evolution will continue:
“It’s been my sense for ages that the Tor we use in five years will look very different from the Tor we use today. Whether that’s still called Tor or not is largely a question of who builds and deploys it first. We are not stepping back from innovation. I want better solutions than we have today that are easier to use and protect people’s privacy.”
The article lists five projects that are “breaking new ground in developing stronger anonymity systems,” including the Dissent Project, the Aqua and Herd projects (for filesharing and voice over IP), Vuvuzela/Alpenhorn (for anonymous chat), Riffle (filesharing), and Riposte (anonymous microblogging). Tor project cofounder Nick Mathewson is urging anonymity developers to begin using their own software:
“What you learn about software from running it is like what you learn from food by tasting it. You can’t actually know whether you’ve made a working solution for humans unless you give it to humans, including yourself.”
No comments yet... Be the first to leave a reply!